ľ�ϸ���Ӱ��

Hadorn, G. H., Biber-klemm, S., Grossenbacher-mansuy, W., Hoffmann-riem, H., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (2008). The Emergence of Transdisciplinarity as a Form of Research. 19–39.

Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10.

Klein, J. T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W., & Welti, M. (Eds.). (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser.

Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515-526.

Klein, J.T. (2013). The Transdisciplinary Moment(um). Integral Review 9, 189–199.

Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., Thomas, C.J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7, 25–43.

Norström, A. V, Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M.F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A.T., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Bremond, A. De, Campbell, B.M., Canadell, J.G., Carpenter, S.R., Folke, C., Fulton, E.A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J., Leach, M., Tissier, M. Le, Martín-lópez, B., Louder, E., Loutre, M., Stafford-smith, M., Tengö, M., Hel, S. Van Der, Putten, I. Van, Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3.

Nowotny, H. (2003). Democratising Expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 151–156.

Pohl, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research: Proposed by the Swiss Academis of Arts and Sciences, Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research. Oekom, Munich.

Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research ? Futures 43, 618–626.

Polk, M. (2014). Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustainability science, 9(4), 439-451.

Robinson, J. (2008). Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1), 70-86.

Seidl, R., Brand, F.S., Stauffacher, M., Krütli, P., Le, Q.B., Spörri, A., Meylan, G., Moser, C., González, M.B., Scholz, R.W. (2013). Science with society in the anthropocene. Ambio 42, 5–12.

Witjes, S., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2021). Transdisciplinary research: approaches and methodological principles. Transdisciplinarity for Sustainability - Connecting Diverse Practices, 2015, 1–20.

Klein, J.T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.) Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� Press.

Hadorn, G.H., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Berlin.

Carew, A. L., & Wickson, F. (2010). The TD wheel: a heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42(10), 1146–1155.

TD Net -

STEPS Centre Methods and Methodologies -

TD Academy - A Platform for Transdiscplinary Research and Studies -

Sustainability Research Effectiveness Program -

Breda, J. van, & Swilling, M. (2019). The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: learning experiences and reflections from a transdisciplinary urban case study in Enkanini informal settlement, South Africa. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 823–841.

Moser, S.C. (2016). Can science on transformation transform science ? Lessons from co-design. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 106–115.

Pohl, C., Krütli, P., Stauffacher, M. (2017). Ten reflective steps for rendering research societally relevant. Gaia 26, 43–51.

Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110-122.

The Reality of Transdisciplinary Processes, Special Issue, Sustainability Science (2015).

Caniglia, G., Schäpke, N., Lang, D.J., Abson, D.J., Luederitz, C., Wiek, A., Laubichler, M.D., Gralla, F., von Wehrden, H. (2017). Experiments and evidence in sustainability science: A typology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 39–47.

The TD Net maintains a list of publications in this domain:

Newig, J., Jahn, S., Lang, D.J., Kahle, J., Bergmann, M. (2019). Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes . Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 147–155.

Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D.J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D.J., Wehrden, H. Von (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1–15.

Kueffer, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bammer, G., Kerkhoff, V., Pohl, C. (2007). Transdisciplinary Publication Culture. Gaia 1, 22–26.

Hegger, D., Lamers, M., Van Zeijl-Rozema, A., Dieperink, C. (2012). Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: Success conditions and levers for action. Environmental Science & Policy, 18, 52–65.

Head, B.W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society 38, 180–197.

Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester: John Wiley.

Ansell, C.K., Bartenberger, M. (2017). Tackling Unruly Public Problems, in: Governance in Turbulent Times Tackling Unruly Public Problems. pp. 1–33.

Fazey, I., Schäpke Niko, Caniglia, G., Patterson, J., Hultman, J., Mierlo, V. B., … Wyborn, C. (2018). Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 54–70.

Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S., Oberlack, C., Providoli, I., … Zimmermann, A. (2019). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environmental Science and Policy, 102, 26–35.

Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., Louder, E. (2020). The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 15–21.

Hel, S. van der. (2016). Environmental Science & Policy New science for global sustainability ? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth. Environmental Science and Policy, 61, 165–175.

Adelle, C., Pereira, L., Gorgens, T., & Losch, B. (2020). Making sense together: the role of scientists in the coproduction of knowledge for policy making. Science and Public Policy, 47(1), 56–66.

Cockburn, J., Cundill, G. (2018). Ethics in Transdisciplinary Research: Reflections on the Implications of ‘Science with Society,’ in: The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Springer, pp. 81–97.

Pohl, C., Hadorn, G. H., Fry, P., Boillat, S., Schneider, F., Speranza, C. I., … Kiteme, B. (2010). Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy, 37(4), 267–281.

Wittmayer, J. M., & Schäpke Niko. (2014). Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 483–496.

Co-production:

Bremer, S., Meisch, S. (2017). Co-production in climate change research : reviewing different perspectives 8, 1–22.

Hel, S. van der (2016). Environmental Science & Policy New science for global sustainability ? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 165–175.

Perry B., Atherton, M. (2017). Beyond critique: the value of co-production in realising just cities? Local Environment, 22:sup1, 36-51,

Wyborn, C., Datta, A., Montana, J., Ryan, M., Leith, P., Chaffin, B., … van Kerkhoff, L. (2019). Co-producing sustainability: reordering the governance of science, policy, and practice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 319–346.

As a form of convergence between disciplines:

Jantsch, E. (1947). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Higher Education, 1(1), 7–37.

National Research Council (2014). Convergence: facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. National Academies Press, Washington D.C.

Co-production (as in co-producing science and social orders):

Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order (pp. 13–45). London: Routledge.

“Mode 2” knowledge production:

Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge, UK.

Post-normal science:

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.

Dankel, D., Vaage, N., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2017). Post-normal science in practice: post-normal science in practice. Futures, 91, 1–4.

Strand, R. (2017). Post-normal science. In C. L. Spash (Ed.). Routledge handbook of ecological economics: Nature and society (pp. 288–298). London: Routledge ISBN-13: 978–1138931510.

Public Participation:

Kasemir, B. (2003). Public Participation in Sustainability Science: a Handbook. Cambridge ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� Press, Cambridge.

Schmidt, L., Falk, T., Siegmund-Schultze, M., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2020). The objectives of stakeholder involvement in transdisciplinary research : a conceptual framework for a reflective and reflexive practise. Ecological Economics, 176.

Stauffacher, M., Flèueler Thomas, Krèutli Pius, & Scholz, R. (2008). Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 409–422.

Talwar, S., Wiek, A., & Robinson, J. (2011). User engagement in sustainability research. Science and Public Policy, 38(5), 379–390.

Belcher, B. M., Rasmussen, K. E., Kemshaw, M. R., & Zornes, D. A. (2016). Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 1–17.

Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Hoffmann, E., Loibl, M.C., Rehaag, R., Schramm, E., Voß, J. (2005). Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinary Research: A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Projects.

Bergmann, M. et al. (2005). Quality criteria for transdisciplinary research. A guide for the formative evaluation of research projects. Frankfurt am Main: Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE). Frankfurt-on-Main

Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research:a literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine: Supplement, 35(2), 123.

Jahn, T., & Keil, F. (2015). An actor-specific guideline for quality assurance in transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65, 195–208.

Wiek, A., Talwar, S., O'Shea, M., & Robinson, J. (2014). Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research. Research Evaluation, 23(2), 117–132.

Jacobs, J. A. (2013). In defense of disciplines : interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� of Chicago Press.

Braden, K., Arnim, W., & Brundiers, K. (2013). The role of transacademic interface managers in transformational sustainability research and education. Sustainability, 5(11), 4614–4636.