ľ�ϸ���Ӱ��

On 21 October 2016, ‘GIRARE project’ coordinators Marjolein van den Brink and Christine Quinan organised an expert seminar.

Lorena Sosa’s project aims to address violence against individuals who challenge traditional gender norms and expectations.

Marjolein van den Brink form Utrecht ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� wrote a blog with colleague Peter Dunne form the ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� of Bristol.

Katharina Boele-Woelki, professor of Family Law at Utrecht ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� was involved in creating new guidelines and principles in European Family Law.

‘Elderly Care and Upwards Solidarity’: Juridische aspecten van vergrijzing en de zorg voor ouderen

In februari 2021 start het nieuwe executive leerprogramma Leiderschap in Cultuur Artistiek

Faculty of Law, Economics, Governance and Organization introduces Education for Professionals Growth Plan (“Ontwikkelagenda OvP”).

Utrecht ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� and Eredivisie CV jointly launched a training programme focused on the social role of professional football organisations.

As of 15 June 2023, the Executive Board has appointed Franck Meijboom Professor of Sustainable Animal Stewardship at the Utrecht ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� Faculty of Veterinary Medicine.

Rutger Claassen and Judith van Erp will publish their essay collection 'Entrepreneurship in the open society' in the month of September.

In the NoVaMiGra project, the Ethics Institute examines the norms and values ​​of the EU.

Utrecht ľ�ϸ���Ӱ�� confers an honorary degree to the American philosopher Michael Sandel.

Claassen wrote an advisory report with Ingrid Robeyns for the Centraal Planbureau on how neutrality can be improved in analyses.

In their new book, Gerhard Bos and Marcus Düwell explore the implications of our moral responsibilities with regard to the rights of future generations.

On CBS ľ�ϸ���Ӱ��, professor in the Ethics of Institutions Ingrid Robeyns talked about the concept of ‘limitarianism’.

With effect from 1 April 2022, Professor Thomas Vaessens has been appointed dean of the Faculty of Humanities by the Executive Board of Utrecht ľ�ϸ���Ӱ��.

In 2023, the research community Critical Pathways offers four residency stays, two in April and two in October.

In contemporary conversation, “myth” is commonly used to mean “misconception”. The usage stems from colonial times when anthropologists differentiated between primitive religions, replete with myths, and the scientific worldview. But in creating this dichotomy, the children of the Enlightenment have been doing themselves a disservice.

When it comes to environmental politics, everywhere we look, there’s a feeling of being stuck. UN summits take one step forwards and two steps back. Scientists are gluing their papers to buildings and their hands to the road because governments are failing to act. Most of us look on dejectedly, wondering what we’re supposed to do, or why we should do it if no one else does.

Many have long marvelled at humans’ capacity for technological innovation. Especially now, amid cascading environmental crises, technology seems to take on a magical quality. We acknowledge the many great things technological innovation has achieved. But holding faith with technological innovation alone is not only high risk: it ignores the exploitation of people and planet on which it depends.