Learning in uncertain situations: How our choices sustain irrational fear

Our beliefs do not just guide our actions, they are also shaped by them. When we act on assumptions, especially in uncertain or emotionally charged situations, our behavior can unintentionally reinforce those assumptions, even if they are inaccurate. This is particularly likely when our decisions are driven not only by a desire to gather information, but also by a hedonic motive, such as seeking comfort or avoiding discomfort. Over time, this feedback loop can make false beliefs feel increasingly valid.

This PhD research explores how such self-reinforcing cycles can give rise the persistence of false beliefs, with focus on irrational fears. Drawing on insights from social psychology and fear conditioning, we examine how early decisions in ambiguous situations shape people’s beliefs – sometimes giving rise to lasting patterns of anxiety and avoidance. This project aims to better understand the subtle and gradual ways in which fear can take cold, even in the absence of any direct negative experience.

 

Involved researchers

  • Emily Vanlooy

    PhD Candidate
  • I am a PhD candidate in psychology, primarily interested in learning and decision-making. My PhD project focuses on motivated sampling and the persistence of irrational fears
  • dr. Chris Harris

    Assistant Professor
  • I am an assistant professor and interested in decision-making and especially decisions by experience. My research focusses on why false beliefs (e.g., stereotypes) can be so persistent
  • dr. ir. Ruud Custers

    Associate Professor
  • I am an associate professor, working on goal-directed behaviour, habits, and the role of consciousness. I am involved in various projects exploring these issues in relation to AI and fear-learning. I am co-directing the GoalLab with Baptist Liefooghe

Funding

This project is funded by 'Werkdrukimpuls fonds'.