Why does Utrecht 木瓜福利影视 still appear in the QS Rankings?
Utrecht 木瓜福利影视 has decided to no longer actively participate in rankings. This means that the opportunity to provide information is not used. This decision has already led to the UU鈥檚 exclusion from the Times Higher Education (THE) rankings in September 2023. Despite not providing data, Utrecht 木瓜福利影视 does still appear in the .
Even though Utrecht 木瓜福利影视 (UU) no longer provides information for the rankings of QS, they continue to rank us. For this reason, UU currently still appears in the QS ranking, as well as in those of ShanghaiRanking, CWTS Leiden, NTU, and others. Last year, our cooperation with QS was terminated, but it depends on QS policy how long UU will appear in this ranking.
For the ShanghaiRanking, universities do not provide information; instead, this ranking relies on public and paid sources. This explains why UU may still be ranked. In many respects, including this one, it is unclear how these rankings operate. In any case, UU will not submit information for rankings that do not adhere to the principles of open science that UU propagates.
Why UU decided to move away from rankings
UU's decision not to submit data for rankings is a conscious choice:
- Prioritizing collaboration: Rankings put too much stress on scoring and competition, while we want to focus on collaboration and Open Science.
- Complexity of quality: It is almost impossible to capture the quality of an entire university with all its different education, research, and impact in one number.
- Questionable methods: shows that rankings are often based on self-reported data by universities and on methodology that is not very transparent.
Strength in unity
The decision to no longer provide the required data to be included in rankings was made in the context of Open Science and the cultural change towards recognition and rewards. UU, like many other Dutch and international universities, has been critical of rankings for a long time. UU鈥檚 decision to no longer actively participate is in line with our values and ambitions and what we stand for in the (inter)national academic community.
Other Dutch universities are also thinking about their participation in rankings. See (pdf) that the Universities of the Netherlands (UNL) have jointly prepared on the effects of rankings on the academic community and how we should deal with it. We also see an international movement to resist the dominance of rankings, for example at and .
It is crucial for universities to unite in responsibly handling rankings. We encourage students to compare the content and nature of programmes, and for researchers to focus on the quality of research programmes.