How interdisciplinary are you? From hardcore to soft interdisciplinary research

Can we categorise research into different degrees of interdisciplinarity? Dr. 脰zge Bilgili, Assistant Professor of Interdisciplinary Social Science and member of the Utrecht Young Academy, discusses the importance and value of interdisciplinary research based on her own experience in academia. 

鈥淲hen asked the question 鈥榃ho are you as a researcher?鈥, I often find myself responding with one of the following answers: 鈥業鈥檓 a migration scholar鈥; 鈥業鈥檓 a social scientist鈥, 鈥業鈥檓 a sociologist by training鈥 but actually my work relies on many disciplines ranging from political science to human geography鈥. And with the additional benefit of blending such different answers with a simple title, since January 2017, I鈥檓 an assistant professor of Interdisciplinary Social Science within at Utrecht 木瓜福利影视. So I hardly ever question whether I am an interdisciplinary researcher or whether my research is interdisciplinary. To me, the answer has always been a clear 鈥榶es鈥. 

Dr. 脰zge Biligi (Photo: Ed van Rijswijk)

Migration-induced societal challenges are manifold, and thus the disciplinary perspectives through which one can study them. In fact, this was one of the main reasons why I wanted to specialise in this thematic focus, rather than looking at the world through a singular disciplinary lens as an academic right from the start. 

Is there a spectrum ranging from hardcore to soft interdisciplinary research?

So, when I presented my current research Countering the Virus: Discrimination and protestation in multicultural Europe (COVID) at the most recent General Assembly of the Utrecht Young Academy, I did not expect that it would trigger a discussion on how and under what conditions a project can be considered 鈥榠nterdisciplinary enough鈥. Is there a spectrum ranging from hardcore to soft interdisciplinary research? Should research cross natural and social sciences to be considered interdisciplinary? Can we assume that research bringing together different branches of social sciences is less challenging and thus 鈥榣ess interdisciplinary鈥?

In the COVID Project, funded by Utrecht 木瓜福利影视鈥檚 Migration and Societal Challenges Focus Area, we cooperate with colleagues from Human Geography (Maggi Leung) and Media and Culture Studies (Rick Dolphijn). We try to understand prejudice, stigma and discrimination that is practised on and resisted by people of Asian appearance in Europe during the Corona pandemic. In particular, we look at the role of artistic expression and social media as spaces of protest and alliance-building. 

It is especially when such diverse points of references and research fields cross each other that our conversations become truly refreshing, freeing and undeniably inspiring.

Assistant Professor of Interdisciplinary Social Science

In our collaboration we may be speaking a similar language and understand each other but we also refer to and reflect on very different perspectives and lines of research. When Rick Dolphijn quotes journalist Ta-nehisi Coates and says we should build upon the idea that 鈥楻ace, is the child of racism, not the father鈥, I bring a literature review that looks at how contagious diseases and earlier epidemics such as SARS have led to the 鈥榠ntersectional discrimination鈥 of individuals across the globe.

It is especially when such diverse points of references and research fields cross each other that our conversations become truly refreshing, freeing and undeniably inspiring. And to me that is what matters when thinking of interdisciplinary research. I may be considered to do 鈥榮oft interdisciplinary research鈥, but this does not make the inspiration I get from it less valid and important to do excellent quality research.鈥

脰zge Bilgili, PhD. Member of the Utrecht Young Academy. Assistant Professor of Interdisciplinary Social Science.