WICS & WISE+ organise panel on diversity and stereotyping in academia

鈥淚nclusion takes more than just policy鈥

WICS & WISE+ panel on diversity & inclusion in academia

What does it take to create a safe space in academia? At a recent panel organised by WICS (Women in Information and Computing Sciences) and WISE+ (), that question came up more than once. With six panelists from different backgrounds, the event focused on real-life experiences with diversity, discrimination, and subtle (and not-so-subtle) biases in education and research.

Making academic spaces feel safer and more inclusive doesn鈥檛 lie in rules or good intentions alone, according to the panel. Change comes when people share their experiences, when institutions take action, and when the daily reality in classrooms, labs, and hiring processes is taken seriously.

Policy

Lynda Hardman, a professor at Utrecht 木瓜福利影视 since 2015, reflected on more than ten years of pushing for change in academia. One major shift came when UU introduced a rule that at least 35% of new assistant professor hires had to be women, she said. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 when things started moving.鈥

Stereotypes

However, gender stereotypes still affect education and research, the panelists agreed. Gunnar H煤ni Bj枚rnsson, policy advisor and chair of , noted that programmes seen as 鈥榝eminine鈥, such as psychology or applied AI, are often undervalued. A dynamic that Hugo van der Wilt (a board member of , however, not speaking on behalf of the association nor the board during the panel) also observes in the sciences: 鈥淲omen tend to choose applied subjects or climate science, fields that are then labeled as less 鈥榟ard鈥欌, he observed.

WICS & WISE+ panel on diversity & inclusion in academia

Change is happening slowly, though: Francisca Pessanha, a PhD candidate in the Human-Centered Computing group, sees their own technical field becoming more attractive to women, partly because the image of the engineer is shifting. 鈥淚鈥檝e noticed that, in the last couple of years, it has become more socially acceptable for women to study engineering in my home country.鈥

Good intentions

Bias doesn鈥檛 just disappear just because you mean well, and lasting change needs more than good intentions. 鈥淵ou can genuinely believe in equality and still act on subconscious bias,鈥 Claudia Wieners, assistant professor in Physical Oceanography, explained. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 why we all need to actively work against our biases, as much as possible.鈥 She also mentioned the importance of how we respond to biased behaviour: 鈥淚f someone acts in a biased way, it doesn鈥檛 always come from a bad place. That behaviour should be discussed, but not in an accusatory way unless there鈥檚 clear evidence of harmful intent.鈥 In hiring, for instance, confidence is often mistaken for competence. 鈥淢en tend to come across as more self-assured. That doesn鈥檛 mean they鈥檙e better,鈥 Hardman added. 鈥淛ust an example of how bias can sneak in.鈥

You can genuinely believe in equality and still act on subconscious bias. That鈥檚 why we all need to actively work against our biases, as much as possible

Stories

Not everyone cares about diversity and inclusion. So, how do you get people to care? Wieners: 鈥淧eople like stories. They switch off when you start talking in abstract terms,鈥 she said. 鈥淏ut if you keep it concrete, they鈥檒l listen.鈥

According to Barbara van den Berg, educational director of the bachelor鈥檚 Mathematics, change can be influenced through daily behavior, especially for teachers. 鈥淲e all need to show the behaviours we want to promote: ask questions, participate, show openness,鈥 she said. Student networks play a role as well. 鈥淢inority students often form smaller groups, but to really thrive, you need a broader support system. Try to include different people in your network.鈥

One final takeaway for teachers to invite more interactions in the classroom: instead of asking 鈥渄oes anyone have a question?鈥, try 鈥渨hat questions do you have?鈥 That small change can make a big difference in making people feel invited to speak.

WICS & WISE+ panel on diversity & inclusion in academia

The panel discussion was attended by a variety of people from the Faculty of Science. More than forty people joined the event, and most of them came from the departments of Mathematics and Computing Sciences. Two-thirds were bachelor鈥檚 students, alongside faculty members, PhD candidates, and master鈥檚 students. The group was diverse in gender identity: 60% identified as women, 34% as men, and 6% as non-binary, and participants came not only from the Netherlands, but also from countries including Germany, Romania, Afghanistan, Belgium, Italy, Georgia and Turkey. The discussion was moderated by Lauren Beehler.

WICS continues to host panels, talks, and networking events to build a more inclusive academic culture.